Liberty To Breathe
The ban on smoking in restaurants and bars throughout Arizona goes into effect today. And I'm delighted, purely because it will benefit me. I guess you could say this is an example of my new approach to life, which I'm provisionally terming "libertarianism."
Gaw'Bless Amurr-ikka
Fine. I accept this. Why, though, is this principle of jurisprudence so selectively and narrowly applied? Why aren't the same prohibitions attached to cell phone users (they ruin the atmosphere just about everywhere they go), automobile drivers, meat-eaters (HUGE carbon footprint there), and so on? Because to do so would be to usher in such a micro-managed Nanny State that no self-respecting libertarian -- or for that matter, no self-respecting Foucauldian (didn't F. once advise his students to read F. A. Hayek?) -- would want to live in it; but this is precisely the day-to-day political reality we've constructed for our those among us who take tobacco.
Just tryin' to keep the torch of liberty burnin'. . .
And, oh, yeah, let's bring back the gold standard and the Articles of Confederation while we're at it! :-)
Re: Gaw'Bless Amurr-ikka
Re: Gaw'Bless Amurr-ikka
You know it's a hardline comment when Dr. Bertsch is forced to use academic-critical language.
"we need to take account of the practical, real-world contexts that inform decision-making"
Re: Gaw'Bless Amurr-ikka
Once you realize that what we're talking about with this Tucson smoking ban is just good ol' fashioned bully politics -- pushin' around the unpopular guy for our heady little will-to-power rush -- we'll never be able to have a fruitful discussion. You just don't know how thoroughly you've been taught to dance to the authoritarian's tune. Pulmonary health is not an inalienable right -- just ask the EPA. Besides, the *air* in Tucson's gonna kill you faster than the smoke in Club Congress, or in any other scenester hang.
Gyms are gulags. Stop being your body's slave.
Respectfully,
"That Guy"